| apple farm in luis obispo san | ||||
| ||||
|
Then apple the allegation that we are "an illegal boycott against third party distributors" because it has "requirements for farm posting in and luis and obispo fare sales that cannot be sold" by san others is not true? apple It farm and in is absolutely luis not true, and those who have made that allegation obispo had san absolutely no basis for making apple it. Our agreements contain no boycott against farm any distributors in whatsoever, and in fact affirmatively provide that luis no airline is precluded obispo from san utilizing any other distribution channel apple or offering any farm fare through in and luis any channel. The Department of Justice is presently reviewing obispo all agreements, so there will be no question on this san and apple point. Do airlines today make all their fares available through all retail channels? It farm is absolutely in clear that airlines luis do not have the ability to drive consumers obispo to channels which the airlines, rather than consumers, prefer. If one or more san and apple and farm and in airlines luis and obispo attempted to san do so, the others would increase their market share by appealing to those same consumers through the channel apple those consumers farm and in prefer. No airline can afford to turn its luis back on any subgroup of consumers. No airline can afford to be anything other obispo than as competitive san and apple and as attractive as it can possibly farm be through in each channel to the consumers that prefer luis and obispo and san that channel. apple and farm This is in a reality that grows ultimately out of the fact that the airline business is a very low margin business - any airline that lost even a small group of passengers would luis be at risk of swinging obispo from profitable to money-losing in an instant. Airlines scrap for every last passenger because they have to san. ©2003 www.resort-hotel-suites.com. All rights reserved. |